Ranking of LSOAs according to their score in the Education, Skills and Training Deprivation domain.
(showing types of area available in these data)
Note: These may be large files.
The English Indices of Deprivation provide a relative measure of deprivation at small area level across England. Areas are ranked from least deprived to most deprived on seven different dimensions of deprivation and an overall composite measure of multiple deprivation. Most of the data underlying the 2010 indices are for the year 2008.
The indices have been constructed by the Social Disadvantage Research Centre at the University of Oxford for the Department for Communities and Local Government. All figures can only be reproduced if the source (Department for Communities and Local Government, Indices of Deprivation 2010) is fully acknowledged.
The domains used in the Indices of Deprivation 2010 are: income deprivation; employment deprivation; health deprivation and disability; education deprivation; crime deprivation; barriers to housing and services deprivation; and living environment deprivation. Each of these domains has its own scores and ranks, allowing users to focus on specific aspects of deprivation.
Because the indices give a relative measure, they can tell you if one area is more deprived than another but not by how much. For example, if an area has a rank of 40 it is not half as deprived as a place with a rank of 20.
The Index of Multiple Deprivation was constructed by combining scores from the seven domains. When comparing areas, a higher deprivation score indicates a higher proportion of people living there who are classed as deprived. But as for ranks, deprivation scores can only tell you if one area is more deprived than another, but not by how much.
This dataset was created from a spreadsheet provided by the Department of Communities and Local Government, which can be downloaded here.
The method for calculating the IMD score and underlying indicators is detailed in the report 'The English Indices of Deprivation 2010: Technical Report'.
The data is represented here as Linked Data, using the Data Cube ontology.
This is a linked data resource: it has a permanent unique uri at which both humans and machines can find it on the Internet, and which can be used an identifier in queries on our SPARQL endpoint.
A linked data-orientated view of dimensions and values
|(not locked to a value)|
|(not locked to a value)|
Linked Data is stored in graphs. We keep dataset contents (the data) separately from the metadata, to make it easier for you to find exactly what you need.
The data in this dataset are stored in the graph: http://opendatacommunities.org/graph/societal-wellbeing/deprivation/imd-education-rank-2010
The data structure definition for this data cube dataset is stored in the same graph as the data: http://opendatacommunities.org/graph/societal-wellbeing/deprivation/imd-education-rank-2010
All other metadata about this dataset are stored in the graph: http://opendatacommunities.org/graph/societal-wellbeing/deprivation/imd-education-rank-2010/metadata
A breakdown by type of the 32,487 resources in this dataset's data graph.
|Resource type||Number of resources|
|Data structure definition||1|
In addition to this bookmarkable html page, this dataset metadata is also available for our robot customers in the following machine-readable formats. Please refer to the API documentation for more details.
|dataset metadata||JSON RDF/XML Turtle N-Triples Atom|